Drunk Is Beautiful

[Verse 1]

I probably shouldn't say this

Should keep it all inside

But maybe I'm just wasted

Enough to speak my mind, ah-ah

[Pre-Chorus]

I've been wrestling with the darkness

Searching for a light switch

Tell me can you help me get through?

I've been trying to find a reason

Drowning in the deep end

Can you tell me what I should do?

[Chorus]

I wanna feel high on a Sunday morning

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel strong when I feel like falling

I wanna feel everything you do

I wanna feel

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel

I wanna feel everything you do

[Verse 2]

Show me how you do it

I can see the light that's in your eyes

Tell me when the truth hits

How the hell did you not lose your mind?

[Pre-Chorus]

I've been wrestling with the darkness

Searching for a light switch

Tell me can you help me get through?

I've been trying to find a reason

Drowning in the deep end

Can you tell me what I should do?

[Chorus]

I wanna feel high on a Sunday morning

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel strong when I feel like falling

I wanna feel everything you do

I wanna feel (I wanna feel, I wanna feel)

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel (I wanna feel, I wanna feel)

I wanna feel everything you do

I wanna feel high on a Sunday morning

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel strong when I feel like falling

I wanna feel everything you do

I wanna feel (I wanna feel, I wanna feel)

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel (I wanna feel, I wanna feel)

I wanna feel everything you do

[Outro]

I wanna feel high on a Sunday morning

I wanna feel like it's all brand new

I wanna feel strong when I feel like falling

I wanna feel everything you do

[Bad image! Try pasting a different image link!]

Rather than enhance well-being, we found that Facebook use predicts the opposite result – it undermines it..

Published August 14, 2013 in PLOS ONE, the… Read More INTRODUCTION

Online social networks are rapidly changing the way human beings interact. Over a billion people belong to Facebook, the world's largest online social network, and over half of them log in daily [1]. Yet, no research has examined how interacting with Facebook influences subjective well-being over time. Indeed, a recent article that examined every peer-reviewed publication and conference proceeding on Facebook between 1/2005 and 1/2012 (412 in total) did not reveal a single study that examined how using this technology influences subjective well-being over time (Text S1) [2].

Subjective well-being is one of the most highly studied variables in the behavioral sciences. Although significant in its own right, it also predicts a range of consequential benefits including enhanced health and longevity [3]–[5]. Given the frequency of Facebook usage, identifying how interacting with this technology influences subjective well-being represents a basic research challenge that has important practical implications.

This issue is particularly vexing because prior research provides mixed clues about how Facebook use should influence subjective well-being. Whereas some cross-sectional research reveals positive associations between online social network use (in particular Facebook) and well-being [6], other work reveals the opposite [7], [8]. Still other work suggests that the relationship between Facebook use and well-being may be more nuanced and potentially influenced by multiple factors including number of Facebook friends, perceived supportiveness of one's online network, depressive symptomatology, loneliness, and self-esteem [9], [10], [11].

So, how does Facebook usage influence subjective well-being over time? The cross-sectional approach used in previous studies makes it impossible to know. We addressed this issue by using experience-sampling, the most reliable method for measuring in-vivo behavior and psychological experience over time [12]. We text-messaged participants five times per day for 14-days. Each text-message contained a link to an online survey, which participants completed using their smartphones. We performed lagged analyses on participants' responses, as well as their answers to the Satisfaction With Life Questionnaire (SWLS) [13], which they completed before and immediately following the 14-day experience-sampling period, to examine how interacting with Facebook influences the two components of subjective well-being: how people feel (“affective” well-being) and how satisfied they are with their lives (“cognitive” well-being) [14], [15]. This approach allowed us to take advantage of the relative timing of participants' natural Facebook behavior and psychological states to draw inferences about their likely causal sequence [16]–[19].

DISCUSSION

Within a relatively short timespan, Facebook has revolutionized the way people interact. Yet, whether using Facebook predicts changes in subjective well-being over time is unknown. We addressed this issue by performing lagged analyses on experience sampled data, an approach that allowed us to take advantage of the relative timing of participants' naturally occurring behaviors and psychological states to draw inferences about their likely causal sequence [17], [18]. These analyses indicated that Facebook use predicts declines in the two components of subjective well-being: how people feel moment to moment and how satisfied they are with their lives.

Critically, we found no evidence to support two plausible alternative interpretations of these results. First, interacting with other people “directly” did not predict declines in well-being. In fact, direct social network interactions led people to feel better over time. This suggests that Facebook use may constitute a unique form of social network interaction that predicts impoverished well-being. Second, multiple types of evidence indicated that it was not the case that Facebook use led to declines in well-being because people are more likely to use Facebook when they feel bad—neither affect nor worry predicted Facebook use and Facebook use continued to predict significant declines in well-being when controlling for loneliness (which did predict increases in Facebook use and reductions in emotional well-being).

Would engaging in any solitary activity similarly predict declines in well-being? We suspect that they would not because people often derive pleasure from engaging in some solitary activities (e.g., exercising, reading). Supporting this view, a number of recent studies indicate that people's perceptions of social isolation (i.e., how lonely they feel)—a variable that we assessed in this study, which did not influence our results—are a more powerful determinant of well-being than objective social isolation [25]. A related question concerns whether engaging in any Internet activity (e.g., email, web surfing) would likewise predict well-being declines. Here too prior research suggests that it would not. A number of studies indicate that whether interacting with the Internet predicts changes in well-being depends on how you use it (i.e., what sites you visit) and who you interact with [26].

CONCLUDING COMMENT

The human need for social connection is well established, as are the benefits that people derive from such connections [30]–[34]. On the surface, Facebook provides an invaluable resource for fulfilling such needs by allowing people to instantly connect. Rather than enhancing well-being, as frequent interactions with supportive “offline” social networks powerfully do, the current findings demonstrate that interacting with Facebook may predict the opposite result for young adults—it may undermine it.